Multicentre evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 sound processor: feedback from cochlear implant users and professionals

  • Jeanette Martin St Thomas’ Hearing Implant Centre, London, United Kingdom.
  • Christine Poncet-Wallet Hôpital Rothschild – CRIC, Paris, France.
  • Angelika Illg Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Sarah Perrin-Webb West of England Hearing Implant Programme, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Lise Henderson Manchester Cochlear Implant Programme, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Nathalie Noël-Petroff Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
  • Gennaro Auletta Policlinico di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
  • Maria Grazia Barezzani Ospedale Dei Bambini - Ronchettino, Brescia, Italy.
  • Karim Houri Houri Hearing, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Indian Research Group Indian Research Group, Bangalore, India.
  • Heike Bagus CIC Ruhr, Essen, Germany.
  • Ulrich Hoppe Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Jane Humphries John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Wiebke van Treeck Hörzentrum Düsseldorf, HNO-Univ.-Klinik, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Jeroen J. Briaire Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Martina Brendel Advanced Bionics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
  • Nathalie Mathias | nathalie.mathias@advancedbionics.com Advanced Bionics SARL, Bron, France.

Abstract

The aim of this survey was to gather data from both implant recipients and professionals on the ease of use of the Naída CI Q70 (Naída CI) sound processor from Advanced Bionics and on the usefulness of the new functions and features available. A secondary objective was to investigate fitting practices with the new processor. A comprehensive user satisfaction survey was conducted in a total of 186 subjects from 24 centres. In parallel, 23 professional questionnaires were collected from 11 centres. Overall, there was high satisfaction with the Naída CI processor from adults, children, experienced and new CI users as well as from professionals. The Naída CI processor was shown as being easy to use by all ages of recipients and by professionals. The majority of experienced CI users rated the Naída CI processor as being similar or better than their previous processor in all areas surveyed. The Naída CI was recommended by the professionals for fitting in all populations. Features like UltraZoom, ZoomControl and DuoPhone would not be fitted to very young children in contrast to adults. Positive ratings were obtained for ease of use, comfort and usefulness of the new functions and features of the Naída CI sound processor. Seventy-seven percent of the experienced CI users rated the new processor as being better than their previous sound processor from a general point of view. The survey also showed that fitting practices were influenced by the age of the user.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-12-22
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Naída CI Q70, sound processor, ease of use, fitting, cochlear implant.
Statistics
Abstract views: 993

PDF: 528
Appendix: 268
HTML: 291
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Martin, J., Poncet-Wallet, C., Illg, A., Perrin-Webb, S., Henderson, L., Noël-Petroff, N., Auletta, G., Barezzani, M. G., Houri, K., Research Group, I., Bagus, H., Hoppe, U., Humphries, J., van Treeck, W., J. Briaire, J., Brendel, M., & Mathias, N. (2016). Multicentre evaluation of the Naída CI Q70 sound processor: feedback from cochlear implant users and professionals. Audiology Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.160

Most read articles by the same author(s)