State-of-the-art assessment allows for improved vestibular evoked myogenic potential test-retest reliability
The goal of the present study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability values of myogenic responses using the latest guidelines for vestibular assessment. Twenty-two otologically and neurologically normal adults were assessed twice, on two different days. The analyses were carried out using interclass correlations. The results showed that the latest recommendations for vestibular assessment lead to test-retest reliability values that are as high, or greater, than those reported in previous studies. The results suggest that state-of-the-art testing, using the latest recommendations as well as electromyography control, improves reliability values of myogenic responses, more specifically for the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The impact of small differences in experimental procedures on the reliability values of myogenic responses is also addressed.
Curthoys IS. A critical review of the neurophysiological evidence underlying clinical vestibular testing using sound, vibration and galvanic stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;12:132-44.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155-63.
Nguyen KD, Welgampola MS, Carey JP. Test-retest reliability and age-related characteristics of the ocular and cervicalvestibular evoked myogenic potential tests. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:793-802.
Qian W, Houlden D, Adamonis J, et al. Novel method for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: technique and reproducibility. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;41:303-8.
Piker EG, Jacobson GP, McCaslin DL, et al. Normal characteristics of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential. J Am Acad Audiol 2011;22:222-30.
Canadian Academy of Audiology. Vestibular Assessment & Management for Canadian Audiologists: A Scoping review; 2017. Available from: https://canadianaudiology.ca/professional-resources/guidelines-and-position-statements/
Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:636-51.
Wang CT, Young YH. Comparison of the head elevation versus rotation methods in eliciting vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Ear Hear 2006;27:376-81.
Maes L, Vinck BM, De Vel E, et al. The vestibular evoked
myogenic potential: a test-retest reliability study. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:594-600.
Vanspauwen R, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: test-retest reliability and normative values obtained with a feedback method for the sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction. J Vestib Res 2006;19:127-35.
Venhovens J, Meulstee J, Verhagen WI. Ocular and Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) in healthy volunteers: the intra-, interobserver, and the test re-test reliability. J Vestib Res 2015;25:161-7.
Govender S, Rosengren SM, Colebatch JG. The effect of gaze direction on the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential produced by air-conducted sound. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:1386-91.
McCaslin DL, Fowler A, Jacobson GP. Amplitude normalization reduces cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) amplitude asymmetries in normal subjects: proof of concept. J Am Acad Audiol 2014;25:268-77.
- Abstract views: 1364
- PDF: 666
- HTML: 152
Copyright (c) 2018 Lydia Behtani, Maxime Maheu, Audrey Delcenserie, Mujda Nooristani, François Champoux
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.